Why are there long wait times for a visa?
Photo courtesy of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). Numerical and per country limits set by Immigration Law have resulted in extremely long wait times for applicants from certain countries, especially brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens from mainland China (13 years), India (14 years), Mexico (22 years), and Philippines (24 years).
U.S. immigration law allows U.S. citizens to file a petition to sponsor their parents, spouses, children and siblings for green cards. Similarly, Lawful Permanent Residents (LPRs or green card holders) can petition for their spouses and unmarried children to come to the United States. There are always visas available for immediate relatives (parents, spouses and minor children) of U.S. citizens, but for all other family members, there are annual numerical limits.
In addition to these numerical limits, the law also limits the number of immigrants coming to the U.S. from any one country to prevent any one immigrant group from dominating immigration patterns to the United States. This has resulted in extremely long wait times for applicants from certain countries, especially brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens from mainland China (13 years), India (14 years), Mexico (22 years), and Philippines (24 years). Click here for May 2017 Visa Bulletin. Infographics courtesy of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
The per-country limits also result in above-average wait times for employment-based visa applicants. According to the May 2017 Visa Bulletin, those in the EB-3 Skilled Workers & Professionals Category applicants from India will have to wait 12 years for a visa. Follow this link to Annual Report of Immigrant Visa Applicants in the Family-sponsored and Employment-based preferences Registered at the National Visa Center as of November 1, 2017 for more information.
Photo courtesy of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA).
Can I Apply for a Nonimmigrant Visa When I Have a Pending Immigrant Petition?
Foreign nationals whose relatives have filed immigrant petitions for them and are waiting for a visa to become available may be eligible to apply for nonimmigrant visas while they wait, such as the H-1B, L-1 or E-2. For example, if you are applying for the E-2 visa, which is not a “dual intent” visa, (meaning you need to have an intent to depart the U.S. when the visa ends), you should consult with an immigration attorney to determine the proper strategy.
The bar for proving you have an intent to depart the U.S. is generally very low for E-2 visas – a written declaration usually suffices – but this bar is raised when an E-2 applicant has a pending immigrant petition. However, in some circumstances, you can still qualify for the E-2 visa with a showing of sufficient documentation that proves significant ties to your home country. For example, if an E-2 visa applicant has a sibling green card petition outstanding where there is a 7-year wait, he/she would not necessarily be precluded from getting an E-2 visa.
If you have an approved immigrant petition and have been waiting for a visa to become available and have questions, contact us for a comprehensive consultation. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Tumblr, for up-to-date immigration news.
Torregoza Legal PLLC is the law firm for immigrants, by immigrants. We are founded on the motto of LegalEase: we do away with the legal jargon and make law easy to understand, so you can focus on what’s important to you – going for your American Dream.
Contact us at (888) 445-7066 or info@legalease.us. We are also on social media and on Skype: @LegalEaseUS. || www.LegalEase.us
This website and blog constitute attorney advertising. Do not consider anything on this website or blog legal advice as the law is dynamic, particularly in the immigration field and nothing in this website constitutes an attorney-client relationship being formed. Set up a one-hour consultation with us before acting on anything you read here. Past results are no guarantee of future results and prior results do not imply or predict future results. Each case is different and must be judged on its own merits.