Success Stories: Green Card Approval for Marriage-based Adjustment of Status Applicant from Canada
We recently received an approval of lawful permanent residence (a green card) for a Canadian national through her U.S. citizen husband. Congratulations to our clients!
The couple was recently approved for a marriage-based green card for the foreign spouse. Prior to the adjustment of status application, the applicant entered the United States as a visitor. Canadian citizens generally do not require a visa to enter the United States directly from Canada for the purposes of visiting or studying. Some Canadians, do require visas. Click here for more information.
At this time, many marriage based green card application interviews have been waived to address the years-long backlog. In this case, we had submitted evidence of a bona fide marriage at the time of filing and our clients’ interview was waived.
Immigration laws are dynamic with constantly changing policies. Let us help you through them so that you and your family members can make the U.S. your permanent home. Please contact us for a consultation. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Tumblr, for up-to-date immigration news. Please note that past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
RELATED CONTENT:
Torregoza Legal PLLC is the law firm for immigrants, by immigrants. We are founded on the motto of LegalEase: we do away with the legal jargon and make law easy to understand, so you can focus on what’s important to you – going for your American Dream.
Contact us at (888) 445-7066 or info@legalease.us. We are also on social media and on Skype: @LegalEaseUS. || www.LegalEase.us
This website and blog constitute attorney advertising. Do not consider anything on this website or blog legal advice as the law is dynamic, particularly in the immigration field and nothing in this website constitutes an attorney-client relationship being formed. Set up a one-hour consultation with us before acting on anything you read here. Past results are no guarantee of future results and prior results do not imply or predict future results. Each case is different and must be judged on its own merits.